ALLIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. A-1 SPECIALIZED SERVICES & SUPPLIES, INC.

Filing 188

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 8/19/2015. 8/19/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALLIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED and ALLIANCE INDUSTRIES FZC CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 13-2510 A-1 SPECIALIZED SERVICES & SUPPLIES, INC. ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2014, for the reasons stated in the foregoing memorandum, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Alliance Industries Limited and Alliance Industries FZC’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 116) and Defendant A-1 Specialized Services & Supplies, Inc.’s request for summary judgment contained in the Second Supplemental Brief of A-1 in Support of Its Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 182), and all responses replies, memoranda, and submissions thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment with regard to whether the September 6, 2012 Settlement Agreement released the leases and whether there was an alleged oral agreement between the parties to release the leases is DENIED. 2. Defendant’s request for summary judgment, made at oral argument and in its August 4, 2015 supplemental brief (ECF 182) is DENIED. 3. Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment as to Defendant’s affirmative defense of set-off is GRANTED because that affirmative defense fails as a matter of law. 4. The Court will reserve its decision as to the capacity of Alliance Industries FZC to join this lawsuit as a party plaintiff until after the hearing scheduled for September 9, 2015. 1 BY THE COURT: /s/ Michael M. Baylson ___________________________________ MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J. O:\CIVIL 13\13-2510 alliance industries v. A-1 specialized\13cv2510.08.19.15.order.msj.docx 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?