ROY v. SOAR CORP.

Filing 33

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 24 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 24 ) IS GRANTED AS TO ALL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS OF RACE DISCRIM INATION AND TO PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM OF GENDER DISCRIMINATION FOR HER TERMINATION ONLY. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT SOAR CORP. AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF CAROLINE ROY ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS OF RACE DISCRIMINATION AND ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM OF GENDER DISCRIMINATION FOR HER TERMINATION ONLY. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 24 ) IS DENIED AS TO ALL OF PLAINTIFF'S REMAINING CLAIMS OF GENDER DISCRIMINATION. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT� 39;S OBJECTIIONS TO DISCOVERY (DOCKET NO. 22 ) IS DENIED. A STATUS CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16 AT 04:00 PM IN CHAMBERS TO DISCUSS, INTER ALIA, A TRIAL DATE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 8/25/14. 8/26/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(va, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CAROLINE ROY,
Plaintiff,
v.
SOAR CORP.,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 13-2846

ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of August, 2014, upon consideration of (1) Defendant’s Motion
for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 24), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Docket No. 27), and
Defendant’s Reply (Docket No. 30); (2) Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s Objections to
Discovery (Docket No. 22), Defendant’s Response in Opposition (Docket No. 25), it is hereby
ORDERED that:
1.

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 24) is GRANTED IN
PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
a.

b.

JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Defendant SOAR Corp. and
against Plaintiff Caroline Roy on Plaintiff’s claims of race discrimination
and on Plaintiff’s claim of gender discrimination for her termination only.

b.

2.

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 24) is
GRANTED as to all of Plaintiff’s claims of race discrimination and to
Plaintiff’s claim of gender discrimination for her termination only.

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 24) is DENIED
as to all of Plaintiff’s remaining claims of gender discrimination.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s Objections to Discovery (Docket No. 22) is
DENIED.

A STATUS CONFERENCE is scheduled for Tuesday, September 16 at 4:00 p.m. in

Chambers to discuss, inter alia, a trial date.
It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.

2