SPRENG v. THOMPSON et al

Filing 21

ORDER THAT UPON DE NOVO REVIEW, THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 2/8/17. 2/9/17 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PAUL SPRENG, Petitioner vs. SUPT. BRIAN THOMPSON, et al., Respondents : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2904 ORDER AND NOW, this 8th day of February, 2017, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, that: 1. Upon de novo review, the petitioner’s Objections are OVERRULED. 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED with prejudice. 3. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED for all purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?