T.R. v. DELAWARE COUNTY OFFICE OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH et al

Filing 28

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 23) IS GRANTED AS TO THE CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT AKPUNONU IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND DENIED AS TO THE MONELL CLAIM (COUNT I) AND THE ADA AND RA CLAIM (COUNT II) AGAINST THE COUNTY. DEFEDANTS HAVENS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 24) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 11/26/13. 11/27/13 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA T.R., Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF DELAWARE, et. al., Defendants. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 13-2931 ORDER AND NOW, this 26TH day of November, 2013, upon consideration of Defendants Steven Akpunonu and County of Delaware’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 23) and Plaintiff’s response in opposition (Doc. No. 26) and Defendant Donald Havens’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 24) and Plaintiff’s response in opposition (Doc. No. 25), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 23) is GRANTED as to the claims against Defendant Akpunonu in his individual capacity and DENIED as to the Monell claim (Count I) and the ADA and RA claim (Count II) against the County. (2) Defendant Havens’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 24) is GRANTED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lynne A. Sitarski LYNNE A. SITARSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?