T.R. v. DELAWARE COUNTY OFFICE OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 23) IS GRANTED AS TO THE CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT AKPUNONU IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND DENIED AS TO THE MONELL CLAIM (COUNT I) AND THE ADA AND RA CLAIM (COUNT II) AGAINST THE COUNTY. DEFEDANTS HAVENS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 24) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 11/26/13. 11/27/13 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF DELAWARE, et. al.,
AND NOW, this
day of November, 2013, upon consideration of Defendants
Steven Akpunonu and County of Delaware’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 23) and Plaintiff’s
response in opposition (Doc. No. 26) and Defendant Donald Havens’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc.
No. 24) and Plaintiff’s response in opposition (Doc. No. 25), and for the reasons set forth in the
accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 23) is GRANTED as to the claims against
Defendant Akpunonu in his individual capacity and DENIED as to the Monell
claim (Count I) and the ADA and RA claim (Count II) against the County.
Defendant Havens’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 24) is GRANTED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lynne A. Sitarski
LYNNE A. SITARSKI
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?