SNIDER et al v. STERLING AIRWAYS, INC. et al
Filing
454
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL IS DENIED FOR THE REASONS OUTLINED IN THE PRECEDING MEMORANDUM OPINION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND TEH JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AND THE JUDGMENT ISSUED BY THE COURT ON 2/17/2017 AND ENTERED ON THE DOCKET ON 2/21/2017 SHALL BE AMENDED TO ADD THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT IN VIEW OF THE JURY'S FINDINGS AND VERDICT AS AFORESAID, THE CROSS-CLAIMS OF DEFENDANTS CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC. AND STERLING AIRWAYS, INC. AGAINST ONE ANOTHER ARE HEREBY DISMISSED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 8/29/2017. 9/5/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ELIZABETH C. SNIDER, Individually
and as Executrix of the Estate of
DANIEL A. SNIDER, and
LEE W. SNIDER, a minor, by his
mother, ELIZABETH C. SNIDER
:
: CIVIL ACTION
:
:
: NO. 13-CV-2949
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Plaintiffs
vs.
STERLING AIRWAYS, INC., and
CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC.,
Defendants
ORDER
AND NOW, this
29th
day of August, 2017, upon
consideration of the Motion of Defendant Continental Motors, Inc.
For New Trial and To Alter or Amend the Judgment Pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 59, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion for New Trial
is DENIED for the reasons outlined in the preceding Memorandum
Opinion.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Alter or Amend the
Judgment is GRANTED and the Judgment issued by this Court on
February 17, 2017 and entered on the docket on February 21, 2017
(Doc. No. 409) shall be AMENDED to add the following paragraph:
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in view of the Jury’s findings
and Verdict as aforesaid, the Cross-claims of Defendants
Continental Motors, Inc. and Sterling Airways, Inc. against one
another are hereby DISMISSED AS MOOT.
BY THE COURT:
s/J. Curtis Joyner
J. CURTIS JOYNER,
J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?