VERMA v. 3001 CASTOR, INC. et al

Filing 46

ORDER of MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (ECF NO. 45) that UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE FOLLOWING MOTINOS AND THE REPLIES AND RESPONSES THERETO, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 35] IS DENIED.... IT IS FURTHER O RDERED that A TELEPHONE CONFERENCE REGARDING THE CONTENT OF THE PROPOSED NOTICE IS SCHEDULED FOR 11:00 A.M.ON WEDNESDAY JULY 2, 2014. THE COURT WILL INITIATE THE CALL.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 6/30/2014. 6/30/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF.(mo, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PRIYA VERMA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, : : : : : : : : : v. 3001 CASTOR, INC., d/b/a THE PENTHOUSE CLUB and/or THE PENTHOUSE CLUB @ PHILLY, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION No. 13-3034 : ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of June, 2014, upon consideration of the following motions and the replies and responses thereto, it is ORDERED as follows:  Defendant’s motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 35] is DENIED.  Plaintiff’s motion to strike the Lenahan affidavit and supporting appendices [ECF No. 38] is DENIED as moot.  Plaintiff’s motion for conditional class certification on her FLSA claims [ECF No. 21] is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s request for production of potential plaintiffs’ contact information and the dissemination of notice is conditionally GRANTED pending a telephone conference with the Court regarding the content of the proposed notice.  Verma’s motion for Rule 23 Class Certification of her state law claims [ECF No. 32] is DENIED without prejudice to refile the motion at the close of discovery. It is further ORDERED that a telephone conference regarding the content of the proposed notice is scheduled for 11:00 a.m. on Wednesday, July 2, 2014. The Court will initiate the call. s/Anita B. Brody __________________________ ANITA B. BRODY, J. Copies VIA ECF on _________ to: Copies MAILED on _______ to:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?