MARKS & SOKOLOV, LLC v. MIRESKANDARI et al

Filing 87

ORDER THAT THE MOTION (DOC. 62 ) IS GRANTED AND DEFENDANT PAUL BAXENDALE-WALKER IS: FOUND BY THE COURT TO BE IN CONTEMPT OF THIS COURTS MARCH 11, 2015 ORDER (ECF 50 ). ORDERED TO PAY ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS OF $10,000 TO PLAINTIFF WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER; AND ORDERED TO PROVIDE FULL, COMPLETE AND VERIFIED RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS DISCOVERY WITHOUT OBJECTION, WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS OF THIS ORDER. IN THE EVENT DEFENDANT PAUL BAXENDALE-WALKER DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, HE IS FINED $250 PER DAY UNTIL FULL, COMPLETE, AND VERIFIED RESPONSES, WITHOUT OBJECTION, ARE MADE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 7/27/15. 7/29/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (mas, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARKS & SOKOLOV, LLC v. C.A. NO. 13-3152 SHAHROKH MIRESKANDARI and PAUL BAXENDALE-WALKER ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2015, upon consideration of plaintiff=s motion to hold defendant Paul Baxendale-Walker in contempt and for sanctions, and all responses and replies thereto, It is hereby ORDERED that the motion [Doc. 62] is GRANTED and defendant Paul Baxendale-Walker is: 1. Found by the Court to be in contempt of this Court=s March 11, 2015 Order [ECF 50]. 2. ORDERED to pay attorney=s fees and costs of $10,000 to Plaintiff within ten (10) days of the date of this Order; and 3) ORDERED to provide Afull, complete and verified responses@ to Plaintiff=s Discovery without objection, within ten (10) days of this Order. In the event defendant Paul BaxendaleWalker does not comply with this Order, he is fined $250 per day until Afull, complete, and verified@ responses, without objection, are made. 4) The Court will not entertain a motion to stay this Order. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?