BROWN v. WETZEL et al

Filing 8

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS PLACED IN SUSPENSE UNTIL THE CONCLUSION OF PETITIONER'S STATE APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS AND PETITIONER SHALL NOTIFY THE COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE CONCLUSION OF HIS STATE PROCEEDINGS SO THAT HIS HABEAS PETITION MAY PROCEED IN THIS COURT. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 5/30/14. 5/30/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER. (jpd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTHONY BROWN, Petitioner, No. 13-3579 v. JOHN E. WETZEL, et al., Respondents. ORDER AND NOW, this )ff:t--dJJ.y of 4, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of Petitioner Anthony Brown's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254, the Government's Response, and available state court records, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is placed IN SUSPENSE until the conclusion of Brown's state appellate proceedings; and 3. Petitioner and Respondents SHALL NOTIFY the Court within thirty days of the conclusion of the state proceedings in his case so that the Habeas Corpus Petition may proceed in this Court. BY THE COURT: HOll:Petrese B. Tucker, C.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?