SERRANO v. WETZEL et al
Filing
17
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 6/10/2014. 6/11/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF, AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(uh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN OLMEDO SERRANO,
Petitioner,
v.
SECRETARY WETZEL, et al.,
Respondents.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
No. 13-3618
ORDER
AND NOW, this _______ day of ______, 2014, upon careful and independent
consideration of Petitioner John Olmedo Serrano’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the Government’s Response, and available state court records, and after
review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K.
Caracappa and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice;
3. There is a no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical
purposed.
BY THE COURT:
/s/Petrese Tucker
________________________________
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, C.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?