ADKINS v. WETZEL et al
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR THE COURT TO RECONSIDER (DOC. NO. 45) IS DENIED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. NOS. 1, 3) IS DENIED. AN APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY (DOC. NO. 27) IS DENIED. PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 46) IS DENIED AS MOOT.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 3/17/17. 3/17/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN. (pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN E. WETZEL, et al.
AND NOW, this 17th day of March 2017, upon consideration of Petitioner’s Motion for
the Court to Reconsider its Order dated August 18, 2014 (Doc. No. 45), and Petitioner’s Motion
to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 46), it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Petitioner’s Motion for the Court to Reconsider (Doc. No. 45) is DENIED.
2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. Nos. 1, 3) is DENIED.
3. An Application for a Certificate of Appealability (Doc. No. 27) is DENIED because,
based on the analysis contained in Magistrate Judge Wells’s Report and
Recommendation, as approved and adopted by this Court, and for reasons stated in this
Court’s Opinion issued this day on Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration, a reasonable
jurist could not conclude that the Court is incorrect in denying and dismissing the
4. Petitioner’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 46) is DENIED AS MOOT.
BY THE COURT:
/ s / J oel H. S l om s k y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?