CAMMAROTA et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Filing
48
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 12/12/13. 12/17/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOSEPH CAMMAROTA, a Minor, by
AMY LYNN HALLOCK, Guardian,
and AMY LYNN HALLOCK,
individually
v.
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM
CORPORATION d/b/a
GLAXOSMITHKLINE
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 13-3677
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of December, 2013, upon consideration of Defendant’s
Motion for Reconsideration (Docket No. 43) and all documents filed in connection therewith,
and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
the Motion is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ John R. Padova
_________________________
John R. Padova, J.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
