GOODE v. FERREL et al

Filing 40

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPETD; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILTY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 10/2/14. 10/3/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(jpd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FILED

CIVIL ACTION

RONALD GOODE,

OCT - 2 2014

Petitioner
NO. 13-3680

v.

MICHAEL G. KUNZ, Clerk

Dep. Clerk

By

M. FARRELL, et. al.
Respondents

ORDER

AND NOW,

this~y of {!)cf-

, 2014, upon careful and

independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 3) filed September 16,
2013, 1 Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 13) filed December 18,
2013, the Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 32) filed April 15, 2014,
Petitioner's Reply (Doc. 33) filed April 21, 2014, and after review of the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin dated May 1, 2014,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

the Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2.

the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED without prejudice and

DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and
3.

there is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
BY THE COURT:

As noted by my August 15, 2013 Order, when Petitioner initially filed his Petition for a Writ of

Habeas Corpus (Doc. I), he did not u;:;e the current standard 28 U.S.C. § 2241 form as has been required by this
court since October 2009. See Doc. 2. Petitioner was provided with a blank copy of the Court's current standard
form for habeas corpus relief, which he completed, and returned to the Clerk of Court for filing on September 16
2013. See Doc. 3.

'