CINTAO et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION

Filing 40

ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE IS GRANTED AND THIS CASE IS TRANSFERRED TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 10/9/2013. 10/10/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
I.C., a Minor, by MARIA PINO and
THOMAS CINTAO, Guardians,
and MARIA PINO and THOMAS
CINTAO, Individually
Plaintiffs,
v.
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM
CORPORATION d/b/a
GLAXOSMITHKLINE,
Defendant

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 13-3681

MEMORANDUM ORDER
Before the court is defendant’s motion to transfer venue. Substantially similar motions
have been ruled upon and granted by judges of this court as recently as August 14, 2013 (Judge
Bartle) and August 16, 2013 (Judge McLaughlin).
Plaintiffs’ response to defendant’s motion is boilerplate in many aspects (see pages 7-12
of its brief in this case and pages 7-12 in 13cv3695) and does not address the cases decided
against it (supra).
I adopt the analysis of Judges Bartle and McLaughlin and enter the following order:
AND NOW, this 9th day of October, 2013, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to
Transfer Venue, and the responses filed thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion
(Docket No. 2) is GRANTED, and this case is TRANSFERRED to the Southern District of
Florida.
BY THE COURT:

s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S. J.