EVANS v. LAMAS et al

Filing 34

ORDER THAT THE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 31) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. NO. 1) IS DISMISSED AS MOOT; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS ACTION.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 1/29/18. 1/31/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEVIN ROBERT EVANS, Petitioner, v. MARIROSA LAMAS, ET AL., Respondents. : : : : : : Civ. No. 13-3723 ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2018, upon careful and independent consideration of Kevin Robert Evans’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), Respondents’ Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 8), Judge Strawbridge’s Supplemental Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 31) to which there are no objections, and available state court records, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Supplemental Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 31) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED as moot; 3. A Certificate of Appealability shall NOT ISSUE because Petition has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of this ruling. See U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and 4. The CLERK OF COURT shall CLOSE this action. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Paul S. Diamond _______________________ Paul S. Diamond, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?