ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE COMPANY v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al

Filing 34

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT TEVA'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND FOR FEES AND COSTS (DOCKET NO. 6)IS GRANTED IN PART TO THE EXTENT THAT THE COURT HEREBY COMPELS ARBITRATION IN LONDON AND DENIED IN PART AS TO TEVA'S REQUESTS FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 10/11/13. 10/11/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(rab, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES LTD., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 13-3869 ORDER AND NOW, this 11th day of October, 2013, upon consideration of Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.’s (“Teva”) Motion to Compel Arbitration and for Fees and Costs (Docket No. 6), both parties’ submissions relating thereto (Docket Nos. 17, 19, 23, 31 & 32), and oral argument held on October 1, 2013, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Teva’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and for Fees and Costs is: 1. GRANTED IN PART, to the extent that the Court hereby COMPELS ARBITRATION in London pursuant to Condition o of the underlying SRI Policy (Generic Products Patent Infringement Excess Casualty Insurance Binder, Policy No. 25631.3.14 (Compl. Ex. D)); and 2. DENIED IN PART, as to Teva’s requests for attorneys’ fees and costs. BY THE COURT: S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E.K. PRATTER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?