DEUTSCH v. WELLS FARGO BANK et al

Filing 12

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 6 IS GRANTED INSOFAR AS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS I, III, V AS TO ALLEGATIONS UNDER 15 U.S.C. 1681S-2(b), VI, AND VII ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND, AND PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS II, IV, AND V AS TO ALLEGATIONS UNDER 15 U.S.C. 1681S-2(a) ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 10/30/14. 10/31/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WILMA DEUTSCH,
Plaintiff,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK and
DOES 1 through 50,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 13-3914

ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th day of October, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to
Dismiss, (Dkt No. 6), and Plaintiff’s Response thereto, (Dkt No. 10), it is hereby ORDERED that
Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiff’s Claims I, III, V as to allegations under
15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2(b), VI, and VII are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE granting
Plaintiff LEAVE TO AMEND, and Plaintiff’s Claims II, IV, and V as to allegations under 15
U.S.C. § 1681s-2(a) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ C. Darnell Jones, II
C. DARNELL JONES II,

J.