JONES v. JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al

Filing 131

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF AND LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD IS DENIED. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS THE CLERK OF COURT TO MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 10/29/19. 10/30/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KHALIA JONES, : : : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff, v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, INC., Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-4316 ORDER AND NOW, this ___ of October 2019, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 65), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 69), Defendant’s Reply (ECF No. 72), Plaintiff’s Reply (ECF No. 112), and Defendant’s Sur-Reply (ECF No. 119), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief and Leave to Supplement the Record (ECF No. 125) is hereby DENIED. The Court FURTHER ORDERS the Clerk of Court to mark this matter as CLOSED for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker ____________________________ Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J. 1 This Order accompanies the Court’s Memorandum Opinion dated October 29, 2019.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?