JUNKER v. MEDICAL COMPONENTS, INC. et al

Filing 173

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS' THIRD AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT A STATUS TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD ON 1/4/17 AT 3:30 PM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 12/21/16. 12/21/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA _____________________________ : : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : MEDICAL COMPONENTS, INC., et al., : : Defendants. : _______________________________________: LARRY G. JUNKER, CIVIL ACTION No. 13-4606 ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s “Motion to Dismiss Defendants’ Third Amended Answer and Counterclaims” (Doc. No. 143), Defendants’ Response in opposition thereto (Doc. No. 144), and Plaintiff’s Reply (Doc. No. 148), and for the reasons set forth in this Court’s accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: - The Motion is GRANTED such that “Footnote 1” within Defendants’ Third Affirmative Defense is STRICKEN. - The Motion is GRANTED such that “Footnote 3” within Defendants’ First Amended Counterclaim is STRICKEN. - The Motion is GRANTED such that the first bulleted sub-paragraph within Paragraph 10 of Defendants’ First Amended Counterclaim is STRICKEN. - The Motion is GRANTED such that Paragraph 14 of Defendants’ Second Amended Counterclaim is STRICKEN. - The Motion is DENIED in all other respects. It is further ORDERED that a status telephone conference will be held on Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 3:30 p.m. EST to discuss the remaining adjudication of this case. Plaintiff’s counsel shall initiate the conference call with defense counsel prior to calling Chambers. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg ____________________________ MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?