JOHNSON v. FISHER et al

Filing 23

ORDER THAT THE OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED; THE REOPRT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED AND DENIED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILTY; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 9/20/16. 9/20/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANWAR T. JOHNSON v. JON A. FISHER, et al. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 13-4758 ORDER AND NOW, this 20th day of September, 2016, upon careful and independent consideration of Petitioner Anwar T. Johnson’s pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, after de novo review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells and Johnson’s objections thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED: 1. Johnson’s objections to the Report and Recommendation (Document 21) are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation (Document 18) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 3. Johnson’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document 1) is DISMISSED and DENIED without an evidentiary hearing; 4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability; and 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Juan R. Sánchez Juan R. Sánchez, J. .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?