JOHNSON v. FISHER et al
Filing
23
ORDER THAT THE OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED; THE REOPRT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED AND DENIED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILTY; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 9/20/16. 9/20/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANWAR T. JOHNSON
v.
JON A. FISHER, et al.
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 13-4758
ORDER
AND NOW, this 20th day of September, 2016, upon careful and independent consideration
of Petitioner Anwar T. Johnson’s pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254, after de novo review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells and Johnson’s objections thereto, and for the reasons set forth in
the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED:
1.
Johnson’s objections to the Report and Recommendation (Document 21) are
OVERRULED;
2.
The Report and Recommendation (Document 18) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
3.
Johnson’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document 1) is DISMISSED and
DENIED without an evidentiary hearing;
4.
There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability; and
5.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?