THOMAS v. WALSH et al
Filing
6
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 12/11/13. 12/30/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER. (jpd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
VINCENT THOMAS,
Petitioner,
CIVIL ACTION
v.
NO. 13-4759
JEROME W. WALSH,
Superintendent, et al.,
Respondents.
FILED
DEC 8 lJ 2013
rrCHAEL E. KU~ Clerk
,_
AND NOW, this
- Dep.Qerf(
, 2013, upon careful and
independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and available state court
records, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
David R. Strawbridge, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2.
The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
3.
A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, in that the Petitioner has not
demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of the procedural aspects of this
ruling. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,484 (2000); and
4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?