POLLARD v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al

Filing 13

ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION IS GRANTED. ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ONLY ARE HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 1/8/2014. 1/9/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CRYSTAL POLLARD, : : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION 13-4833 ORDER AND NOW, on this 8th day of January, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Doc. No. 10) and Plaintiff’s Response Thereto (Doc. No. 11), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. All claims against Defendant United States of America only are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.1 BY THE COURT: s/J. Curtis Joyner J. CURTIS JOYNER, J. 1 The United States has represented to the Court that, upon dismissal of any FTCA claims, “the United States would be willing to stipulate with Ms. Pollard that, on condition that she will not appeal the dismissal, the United States will voluntarily dismiss its counterclaim against her without prejudice, so that this action can be dismissed and she can proceed on her claims against the City of Philadelphia in the Court of Common Pleas for Philadelphia County.” (Doc. No. 10). Plaintiff replied that she “is agreeable with the proposed recommendation” of the United States. (Doc. No. 11). The Court will consider the stipulation and notice of voluntary dismissal when these documents have been filed.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?