BERKOWITZ v. OPPENHEIMER PRECISION PRODUCTS, INC

Filing 21

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS HEREBY DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 10/28/14. 10/28/14 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANDREW BERKOWITZ, Plaintiff, v. OPPENHEIMER PRECISION PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant. : : : : : : : : MCHUGH, J. CIVIL ACTION No. 13-4917 OCTOBER 28, 2014 ORDER This 28th day of October, 2014, it is ORDERED as follows: Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby DENIED. With respect to punitive damages under the ADA, the motion is denied without prejudice to Oppenheimer’s right to revisit the issue at the close of evidence. Ruling is deferred as to the PHRA discrimination claim, pending supplemental briefing by the Parties. /s/ Gerald Austin McHugh United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?