DIFIORE v. CSL BEHRING, U.S., LLC et al

Filing 44

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT CSL BEHRING LLC MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 9/11/15. 9/11/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP, E-MAILED.(jl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARIE DIFIORE,
Plaintiff,
v.
CSL BEHRING, U.S., LLC, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
No. 13-5027

ORDER
This 11th day of September, 2015, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topics 1 through 8, 10, and 11 as
identified in Plaintiff’s Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is DENIED.
2. Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topic 12 as identified in Plaintiff’s
Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN
PART, as set forth in the accompanying memorandum.
3. Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topic 21 identified in Plaintiff’s
Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN
PART, as set forth in the accompanying memorandum.
4. Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topics 24 through 26 as identified in
Plaintiff’s Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is DENIED.
5. Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topics 29 through 30 as identified in
Plaintiff’s Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is GRANTED.
6. Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topic 32 as identified in Plaintiff’s
Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is DENIED.

7. Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topic 33 as identified in Plaintiff’s
Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is DENIED.
8. Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topic 34 as identified in Plaintiff’s
Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is GRANTED.
9. Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topic 38 as identified in Plaintiff’s
Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is GRANTED.
10. Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topic 40 as identified in Plaintiff’s
Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is GRANTED.
11. Plaintiff is granted leave to file her response to Defendant’s pending Motion for
Summary Judgment after the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition(s).

/s/ Gerald Austin McHugh
United States District Court Judge