RODRIGUEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 8/12/14. 8/12/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND LEGAL, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(lvj, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA, et al.
ORDER RE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
AND NOW, on this 12th day of August, 2014, upon careful consideration of Petitioner
Rodriguez’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 3), the March 12, 2014 Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter (ECF No. 11), Petitioner’s Objections
(ECF No. 23), and all related filings, and for the reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is
The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 11) is APPROVED and
Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 23) are
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 3) is DISMISSED with
There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter closed for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.
O:\CIVIL 13\13-5046 rodriguez v. comm. pa\Order Denying Petiton for Habeas Corpus 8.12.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?