BERGER et al v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. et al

Filing 28

ORDER THAT DEFT CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT A PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE WILL BE SCHEDULED IN DUE COURSE.SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 6/25/14. 6/26/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BERISH BERGER,
KILBRIDE INVESTMENTS LIMITED,
BUSYSTORE LIMITED IN
LIQUIDATION,
TOWERSTATES LIMITED,
BERGFELD CO. LIMITED, and
ARDENLINK LIMITED,
Plaintiffs,

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 13-5195

v.
CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF
PENNSYLVANIA, INC.,
BLANK ROME LLP, and
COZEN O’CONNOR, P.C., ,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant Cushman
& Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint Pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Document No. 5, filed September 19, 2013),
Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Opposition to Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc.’s
Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Document No. 22, filed October 7, 2013), and
Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc.’s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to
Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (Document No. 24, filed October 18, 2013), for the
reasons set forth by Memorandum dated June 25, 2014, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant
Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Document No. 5) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Preliminary Pretrial Conference will be
scheduled in due course.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.

2