FISHMAN v. EPSTEIN et al

Filing 58

OPINION ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF ROBERT M. FISHMAN'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. NO. 52 ), IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 5/7/2015. 5/7/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SPECTOR GADON & ROSEN, P.C.,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 13-2691 (LEAD CASE)

v.
ROBERT M. FISHMAN,
Defendant.
ROBERT M. FISHMAN,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 13-5198

v.
ALAN B. EPSTEIN and SPECTOR GADON
& ROSEN, P.C.,

CONSOLIDATED CASES

Defendants.

ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of May 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff Robert M.
Fishman’s Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 13-5198, Doc. No. 52), and Defendants’
Response (ECF No. 13-5198, Doc. No. 53), it is ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Joel H. Slomsky
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.