EDDY v. COLVIN

Filing 19

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE HON. DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, [#17] IS ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. THE ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 4/13/15. 4/15/15 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DARIAN LEE EDDY, Plaintiff v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendants : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:13-CV-5370-CDJ ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2015, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable David R. Strawbridge, United States Magistrate Judge, (Doc. No. 17), is ADOPTED in its entirety. 1 The above-captioned matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. BY THE COURT: /s/ C. Darnell Jones, II J. C. DARNELL JONES, II J. 1 When a party files timely objections to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report and recommendation to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1). If there are no objections to the report and recommendation or when reviewing those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections are directed, the court should, as a matter of good practice, “satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987). No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation, but the Court has nonetheless reviewed it for clear error.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?