ANDERSON et al v. THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE

Filing 72

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. THE COURT HEREBY DECLARES THAT DEFENDANT THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE IS IN VIOLATION OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, 42 U.S.C. 12181 et seq., AND ORDERED TO ADOPT A CLEAR AND ENFORCEABLE POLICY AND PRACTICE OF WAIVING ANY AND ALL ADMISSION FEES FOR PAID PERSONAL CARE ATTENDANTS ACCOMPANYING SEVERLY DISABLED CLIENTS. DEFENDANT'S FOOTNOTE REQUEST THAT THE EX HIBITS ATTACHED TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION MARKED "CONFIDENTIAL" BE REMOVED FROM THE DOCKET PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES PROTECTIVE ORDER 40 IS GRANTED. THE CLERK'S OFFICE SHALL REFILE THOSE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 5/6/16. 5/6/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL ANDERSON and Vision for Equality, a Non-Profit Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE, Defendant. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 13-5374 ORDER This 6th day of May, 2016, for the reasons explained in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. The Court hereby DECLARES that Defendant The Franklin Institute is in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181 et seq., for failure to reasonably modify its policies and practices to accommodate people with disabilities protected by the Act. Defendant is hereby ENJOINED from continuing these discriminatory practices and ORDERED to adopt a clear and enforceable policy and practice of waiving any and all admission fees for paid Personal Care Attendants accompanying severely disabled clients in a formal capacity as defined in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion. Defendant’s footnote request that the exhibits attached to Plaintiffs’ Motion marked “confidential” be removed from the docket pursuant to the parties’ Protective Order (Doc. 40) is GRANTED. The Clerk’s Office shall REFILE those documents UNDER SEAL. /s/ Gerald Austin McHugh United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?