MARTINEZ v. COLVIN
ORDER THAT THE COURT DECLINES TO ADOPT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED 10/28/14. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED AND THE FINAL DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER IS REVERSED AND THE MATTER IS REMANDE D TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE COURT'S OPINION OF 8/6/15. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 8/6/15. 8/14/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(lisad, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MIRNA LIZ MARTINEZ,
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
AND NOW, this 6th day of August 2015, upon consideration of the Report and
Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter (Doc. No. 16),
Plaintiff Mirna Liz Martinez’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 19), and
the Commissioner’s Response (Doc. No. 21), and after an independent review of the pertinent
record and for the reasons stated in the Opinion of the Court filed this day, it is ORDERED:
1. That the Court declines to adopt the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 16) of
the United States Magistrate Judge dated October 28, 2014.
2. Plaintiff’s Request for Review is GRANTED and the final decision of the
Commissioner is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Administrative
Law Judge for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s Opinion of August 6,
3. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Joel H. Slomsky
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?