GUESS v. ROZUM et al
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 18) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. NO. 1) IS DENIED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 5/15/17. 5/16/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GERALD ROZUM, et al.,
AND NOW, this 15th day of May 2017 upon consideration of Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of
Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), Respondents' Response to the Petition (Doc. No. 14), the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge (Doc. No. 18), and that the
Report and Recommendation has not been objected to by the parties, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 18) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED.
3. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT issue because, based on the analysis contained in
the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, as approved and adopted by this Court, a
reasonable jurist could not conclude that the Court is incorrect in denying and dismissing the
Habeas Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000).
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
c00ELH. SLOMSKY, i
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?