SARPOLIS v. TERESHKO et al
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS (DOCS. 8,10,11,13,21 & 22) ARE GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS AGAINST THE ABOVE REFERENCE DEFENDANTS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS AGAINST LIVE MESSAGE AMERICA, INC . AND CHESTNUT HILL HEALTHCARE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES ARE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. FURTHER ORDERED THAT CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 6/17/14. 6/18/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS, E-MAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KAREN SARPOLIS
Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of
Angela Anastacia Miller,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALLAN TERESHKO et al,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 13-5521
ORDER
AND NOW, this ___ day of June, 2014, upon consideration of Defendants Post & Schell, P.C.
and Heather Tereshko’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8); Defendant CHOP Newborn Care’s Motion to
Dismiss (Doc. 10); Defendant Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11);
Defendant Pennsylvania Professional Liability Joint Underwriting Association’s Motion to Dismiss
(Doc. 13); Defendant Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 21); Defendant Allan
Tereshko’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 22), and all responses thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND
DECREED that Defendants’ motions are GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims against the above-reference
Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Live Message America, Inc.and
Chestnut Hill Healthcare Medical Associates are DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this matter as CLOSED for
statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Petrese B. Tucker
_________________________
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, C. J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?