NILAN v. COLVIN

Filing 20

ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO REMOVE THIS ACTION FROM CIVIL SUSPENSE; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; AND THE CASE IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 4/9/15. 4/9/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ___________________________________ _ JOSEPH F. NILAN, JR. : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-5524 : CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING : COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY : Defendant. : ORDER AND NOW, this 9th day of April 2015, upon consideration of the Plaintiff’s Request for Review, Defendant’s response thereto, and upon review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, to which no objections have been filed, and after a careful, independent review of the administrative record, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to remove this action from civil suspense; 2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED1; and 3. The decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security denying Denise M. Gallo social security disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/Cynthia M. Rufe _____________________ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J. 1 The Report and Recommendation comprehensively addressed the issues in this case, and the Court adopts it in full. In particular, the Court agrees that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) improperly discounted the opinion of Plaintiff’s treating neurologist, Dr. Gupta, based upon a misreading of the findings of physical examinations, and substituted the ALJ’s lay understanding of the meaning of diagnostic tests for the opinion of the treating physician. The Court also agrees that on remand, the ALJ should consider whether to send Plaintiff to a consultative examiner or seek the testimony of a medical expert at the hearing.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?