CLIENTRON CORP. v. DEVON IT, INC.

Filing 106

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 91 , DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION 93 , PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN SUPPORT 94 , AND DEFENDANTS' SUR-REPLY IN OPPOSITION 95 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED. THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT DOCKETED AS OF 10/14/2014 84 WILL BE ORDERED FILED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 81 IS DENIED AS MOOT. TELEPHONE CONFERENCE STATUS CALL WILL BE HELD ON 1/22/2015, AT 12:45PM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 1/5/15. 1/6/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CLIENTRON CORP., CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff v. NO. 13-5634 DEVON IT, INC., et al., Defendants. ORDER RE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ADDING A THIRD PARTY AND NOW, this 5th day of January 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint (ECF 91), Defendants’ Response in Opposition (ECF 93), Plaintiff’s Response in Support (ECF 94), and Defendants’ Sur-Reply in Opposition (ECF 95), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The Second Amended Complaint docketed as of October 14, 2014 (ECF 84) will be ORDERED “Filed.” Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF 81) is DENIED as moot. Defendants shall respond to the amended complaint within fourteen (14) days. No extension will be granted to file a motion to dismiss. Discovery shall proceed on the allegations of the Second Amended Complaint. Telephone conference status call will be held on Thursday, January 22, 2015, at 12:45 p.m. Plaintiff shall initiate call to Chambers at 267-299-7520. BY THE COURT: /s/ Michael M. Baylson _______________________________ MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J. O:\CIVIL 13\13-5634 clientron v. devon it\13cv5634 Order re Leave to Amend.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?