CLIENTRON CORP. v. DEVON IT, INC.
Filing
106
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 91 , DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION 93 , PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN SUPPORT 94 , AND DEFENDANTS' SUR-REPLY IN OPPOSITION 95 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED. THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT DOCKETED AS OF 10/14/2014 84 WILL BE ORDERED FILED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 81 IS DENIED AS MOOT. TELEPHONE CONFERENCE STATUS CALL WILL BE HELD ON 1/22/2015, AT 12:45PM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 1/5/15. 1/6/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CLIENTRON CORP.,
CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiff
v.
NO. 13-5634
DEVON IT, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER RE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ADDING A THIRD PARTY
AND NOW, this 5th day of January 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for
Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint (ECF 91), Defendants’ Response in Opposition (ECF
93), Plaintiff’s Response in Support (ECF 94), and Defendants’ Sur-Reply in Opposition (ECF
95), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The Second Amended Complaint
docketed as of October 14, 2014 (ECF 84) will be ORDERED “Filed.” Defendants’ motion to
dismiss (ECF 81) is DENIED as moot. Defendants shall respond to the amended complaint
within fourteen (14) days. No extension will be granted to file a motion to dismiss. Discovery
shall proceed on the allegations of the Second Amended Complaint. Telephone conference status
call will be held on Thursday, January 22, 2015, at 12:45 p.m. Plaintiff shall initiate call to
Chambers at 267-299-7520.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
_______________________________
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.
O:\CIVIL 13\13-5634 clientron v. devon it\13cv5634 Order re Leave to Amend.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?