HOFFMANN v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al

Filing 58

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DIMISS IS GRANTED. THE REMAINING UTPCPL CLAIM AGAINST WELLS FARGO IS DISMISSED. THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE UTPCPL CLAIM AGAINST PHELAN HALLINAN AND COURTENAY DUNN IS DISMISSED. THE FDCPA CLAIM AGAINST BOTH DEFENDANTS WILL REMAIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 6/16/15. 6/16/15 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SONYA HOFFMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
PHELAN HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, LLP,
and COURTENAY R. DUNN, ESQ.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

MCHUGH, J.

CIVIL ACTION
No. 13-cv-5700

JUNE 16, 2015
ORDER

This 16th day of June, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and
Motion for Reconsideration, as well as all accompanying submissions, it is hereby ORDERED
as follows:
•

The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The remaining UTPCPL claim against Wells
Fargo is dismissed.

•

The Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
The UTPCPL claim against Phelan Hallinan and Courtenay Dunn is dismissed. The
FDCPA claim against both Defendants will remain.

/s/ Gerald Austin McHugh
United States District Court Judge