PASKEL v. NUTTER et al
ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (PAPER NO. 14) IS GRANTED. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 11/17/14. 11/18/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA;
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA,
and JOHN DELANEY
AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2014, upon consideration of plaintiff’s amended
complaint (paper no. 13) and defendant’s motion to dismiss (paper no. 14), and for the reasons
set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (paper
no. 14) is GRANTED.1 The Clerk is directed to mark this case CLOSED.
/s/ Norma L. Shapiro
Defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint is miscaptioned as a second motion to
dismiss on the docket.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?