WHITE v. RACE et al

Filing 16

ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COUNTERCLAIMS (DOC. NO. 4) IS DENIED ON COUNT I (BREACH OF CONTRACT). PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COUNTERCLAIMS (DOC. NO. 4) IS GRATED ON COUNT II (FRAUD). THE CASE WILL PROCEED WITH RE SPECT TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT AND CONVERSION OF INTANGIBLE PROPERTY (COUNTS I AND III). PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED TO FILE AND ANSWER TO THESE TWO COUNTERCLAIMS WITHIN 20 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 4/17/2014. 4/18/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jmg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRIAN WHITE, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-5969 v. SCOTT RACE, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 17th day of April 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaims (Doc. No. 4), Defendants' Response (Doc. No. 7), Plaintiff's Reply (Doc. No. 8), and the supplemental briefs submitted by both parties (Doc. Nos. 13, 14), it is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaims (Doc. No. 4) is DENIED on Count I (breach of contract). 2. Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaims (Doc. No. 4) is GRANTED on Count II (fraud). 3. The case will proceed with respect to Defendants' counterclaims for breach of contract and conversion of intangible property (Counts I and III). Plaintiff is directed to file an Answer to these two counterclaims within 20 days of the date of this Order. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joel H. Slomsky JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J. 12

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?