FRANCIS et al v. HARMON et al
Filing
14
ORDERED THAT FOR THE REASONS STATED IN A MEMORANDUM OF LAW BEARING TODAY'S DATE, THAT THE MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 2/13/2014. 2/18/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NADINE FRANCIS, et al.
v.
JOSEPH HARMON, et al.
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 13-6009
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2014, upon
consideration of the defendant Richard Barth’s motion for partial
dismissal of the plaintiffs’ complaint (Doc. No. 5), and the
opposition thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons stated
in a memorandum of law bearing today’s date, that the motion is
DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?