IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. SCHONEWOLF et al
Filing
82
ORDERTHAT IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IS DENIED. ALLSTATE'S MOTION IS ALSO DENIED WITH RESPECT TO DAN LAGRECA'S COUNTERCLAIMS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 5/26/2015. 5/26/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL SCHONEWOLF, JR. et al.,
Defendants.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
DAN LAGRECA et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 13-6039
ORDER
This 26th day of May, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff IDS Property Casualty
Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgement and all accompanying submissions, as well
as Plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and all
accompanying submissions, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
•
IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.
IDS currently maintains a duty to defend Michael Schonewolf, Jr. in the underlying action.
•
Allstate Insurance Company’s Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings is DENIED. Allstate
currently maintains a duty to defend Dan Lagreca in the underlying action. Allstate’s
Motion is also DENIED with respect to Dan Lagreca’s counterclaims.
/s/ Gerald Austin McHugh
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?