TAX MATRIX TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. WEGMANS FOOD MARKETS, INC.

Filing 141

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL ON DAMAGES 125 IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO MOLD VERDICT TO APPLY PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 04/19/2017. 04/19/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(nds)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TAX MATRIX TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. WEGMANS FOOD MARKETS, INC., Defendant. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 13-6223 O R D E R AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for New Trial on Damages and Alternative Motion to Mold Verdict to Apply Pre-Judgment Interest (ECF No. 125), Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Support of Motion for New Trial on Damages and Alternative Motion to Mold Verdict to Apply Pre-Judgment Interest (ECF No. 135), Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Motion for New Trial on Damages (ECF No. 136), Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief in Further Support of Motion for New Trial on Damages and Proposed Reply Brief (ECF Nos. 137, 137-2), and Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Leave to Submit Surreply Brief and Proposed Surreply Brief (ECF Nos. 138, 138-1), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) Plaintiff’s Motion for New Trial on Damages is 2) Plaintiff’s Alternative Motion to Mold Verdict to DENIED. Apply Pre-Judgment Interest is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is GRANTED insofar as the Court will amend the judgment to add pre-judgment interest at a rate of 6%, amounting to a $57.79 per diem rate, from the date on which payment was due (i.e., August 16, 2013) until the date on which judgment was entered (i.e., June 7, 2016), for a total of $59,292.54. It is DENIED insofar as Plaintiff seeks to add any different amount of pre-judgment interest. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?