TAX MATRIX TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. WEGMANS FOOD MARKETS, INC.
Filing
141
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL ON DAMAGES 125 IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO MOLD VERDICT TO APPLY PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 04/19/2017. 04/19/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(nds)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TAX MATRIX TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
WEGMANS FOOD MARKETS, INC.,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 13-6223
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2017, upon
consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for New Trial on Damages and
Alternative Motion to Mold Verdict to Apply Pre-Judgment
Interest (ECF No. 125), Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Support of
Motion for New Trial on Damages and Alternative Motion to Mold
Verdict to Apply Pre-Judgment Interest (ECF No. 135),
Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Motion for New Trial on
Damages (ECF No. 136), Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File
Reply Brief in Further Support of Motion for New Trial on
Damages and Proposed Reply Brief (ECF Nos. 137, 137-2), and
Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Leave to Submit Surreply Brief and
Proposed Surreply Brief (ECF Nos. 138, 138-1), it is hereby
ORDERED as follows:
1)
Plaintiff’s Motion for New Trial on Damages is
2)
Plaintiff’s Alternative Motion to Mold Verdict to
DENIED.
Apply Pre-Judgment Interest is GRANTED in part and DENIED in
part. It is GRANTED insofar as the Court will amend the judgment
to add pre-judgment interest at a rate of 6%, amounting to a
$57.79 per diem rate, from the date on which payment was due
(i.e., August 16, 2013) until the date on which judgment was
entered (i.e., June 7, 2016), for a total of $59,292.54. It is
DENIED insofar as Plaintiff seeks to add any different amount of
pre-judgment interest.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?