SIERRA v. LAMAS et al
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1 , AND AFTER REVIEW OF THE THOROUGH AND WELL-REASONED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET 18 , IT IS ORDERED THAT THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS 19 ARE OVERRULED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 7/7/15. 7/7/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gs) Modified on 7/7/2015 (gs, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARIROSA LAMAS, et al.,
AND NOW, this
day of July, 2015, upon careful and independent
consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the thorough
and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Richard A. Lloret, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
Upon de novo review, the petitioner’s Objections are OVERRULED.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED with prejudice.
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED for all purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?