ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. CONSTRUCTION METHODS & COORDINATION, INC.

Filing 35

ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS OR STRIKE (DOC. NO. 16) IS GRANTED; AND THE THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT (DOC. N O. 12) IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: THE MOTION TO EXTEND THE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES FILED BY THE THIRD-PARTY DEFE NDANT ON MAY 31, 2014 (DOC. NO. 27), IS DENIED AS MOOT; AND THE MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TO STRIKE UNTIMELY DISCOVERY REQUESTS FILED BY THE THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT ON JUNE 19, 2014 (DOC. NO. 30), IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 8/8/14. 8/8/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CONSTRUCTION METHODS & COORDINATION, INC., doing business as CMC ENGINEERING, INC., Defendant, v. SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., Third-Party Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-6275 ORDER AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2014, after considering the motion to dismiss or strike the third-party complaint filed by the third-party defendant, Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd., on April 14, 2014 (Doc. No. 16), and the response in opposition to the motion filed by the defendant, Construction Methods & Coordination, Inc., doing business as CMC Engineering, Inc., on April 28, 2014 (Doc. No. 19), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The motion to dismiss or strike (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED; and 2. The third-party complaint (Doc. No. 12) is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows: 1. The motion to extend the case management deadlines filed by the third-party defendant on May 31, 2014 (Doc. No. 27), is DENIED as moot; and 2. The motion for a protective order and to strike untimely discovery requests filed by the third-party defendant on June 19, 2014 (Doc. No. 30), is DENIED as moot. BY THE COURT: /s/ Edward G. Smith EDWARD G. SMITH, J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?