KANU v. WARDEN et al

Filing 79

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 58, IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 68, IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL, ECF NO. 69, IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER, ECF NO. 75, IS DENIED AS MOOT. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF ALL DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 3/17/16. 3/21/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF, E-MAILED.(er, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
_________________________________________
ABDUL KANU,
Plaintiff,
v.
WARDEN LINDSEY, LEACH,
MICHAEL MOORE, PANARELLO,
SGT. BRYAN, MS. APT, GOETTER, ATKINS,
OFFICER WACKOO, C.E.C.,
Defendants.
_________________________________________

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

No. 2:13-cv-6451

ORDER
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 58 - Granted
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 68 - Denied
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel, ECF No. 69 - Denied
Plaintiff’s Motion for Order, ECF No. 75 - Denied
AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2016, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum
issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 58, is GRANTED;

2.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 68, is DENIED;

3.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel, ECF No. 69, is DENIED as moot;

4.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Order, ECF No. 75, is DENIED as moot;

5.

Judgment is ENTERED in favor of all Defendants and against Plaintiff; and

6.

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr._______
JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR.
United States District Judge