MILLS-SORRELLS v. COLVIN
ORDER THAT THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE IS REMOVED FROM SUSPENSE. PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE SUSTAINED IN PART. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS NOT ADOPTED. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED. THIS CASE IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 12/21/2015. 12/22/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
o/b/o Maziah Mills-Sorrells
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of the Social
AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff Essie
Mills-Sorrells’s Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review, the
Commissioner of Social Security’s response thereto, and Plaintiff’s reply; after careful and
independent review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne
A. Sitarski, Plaintiff’s objections thereto, and the Commissioner’s response; following an oral
argument; and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED:
1. The above-captioned case is REMOVED from SUSPENSE;
2. Plaintiff’s objections to the Report and Recommendation (Document 20) are
SUSTAINED in part;
3. The Report and Recommendation (Document 19) is not adopted; and
4. Plaintiff’s Request for Review (Document 11) is GRANTED. This case is REMANDED
to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for an award of
benefits in an amount to be calculated by the Commissioner for the period of disability
covered by Plaintiff’s August 11, 2011, application.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?