BRENNAN et al v THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSLYVANIA

Filing 86

ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 74) IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; & DEFT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 79) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE ON 6/21/16. 6/21/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT W. BRENNAN, et al.
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 13-6635

ORDER
AND NOW, on June 21, 2016, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (doc. 74) is DENIED with
prejudice; and
2. Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (doc. 79) is DENIED without
prejudice.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Timothy R. Rice
TIMOTHY R. RICE
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE