BYRNE et al v. BEERS et al

Filing 12

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS' CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 6/17/2014. 6/17/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KEITH and KEREN BYRNE,
Plaintiffs,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 13-6953

v.
RAND BEERS, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 17th day of June 2014, upon consideration of the Complaint (Doc.
No. 1), Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or Motion for Summary Judgment in the Alternative
(Doc. No. 6), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc.
No. 7), Defendants’ Reply in Further Support of their Motion (Doc. No. 9), all related filings and
exhibits, the arguments made by counsel for the parties at a hearing on the Motions held on
March 20, 2014, and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is
ORDERED as follows:
1.

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 6) is GRANTED.

2.

Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 7) is DENIED.

3.

The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joel H. Slomsky
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.