FELKER et al v. USW LOCAL 10-901 et al

Filing 41

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 27) IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 29) IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE (DOC. 30) IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLIES (DOC. 35, 38) ARE DENIED. CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 6/8/16. 6/9/16 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PAUL L. FELKER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 13-7101

v.
USW LOCAL 10-901, USW LOCAL 10-901
(SU) AND USW LOCAL 10-901 (NE)
MARCUS HOOK REFINERY WORKERS
INVOLUNTARY TERMINATION PLAN,
Defendant.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 8th day of June, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 27), Plaintiffs’ Statement of Undisputed Facts (Doc. No. 28),
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 29), the Responses in Opposition to the
Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 31, 33), Defendant’s Motion to Strike (Doc. No.
30), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Statement of Undisputed Facts (Doc. No.
32), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition to the Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 36), Defendant’s
Motions for Leave to File Replies (Doc. Nos. 35, 38), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition to
Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply to its Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No.
37), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED as
follows:
1.

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 27) is DENIED.

2.

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 29) is GRANTED.

3.

Defendant’s Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 30) is GRANTED.

4.

Defendant’s Motions for Leave to File Replies (Doc. Nos. 35, 38) are DENIED.

5.

The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:
/ s / J oel H. S l om s k y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

2