GORDON v. MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

Filing 119

ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF HER CLAIMS UNDER THE WPCL (ECF NO. 73) IS DENIED. DEFT'S MOTION TO DE-CERTIFY THE CONDITIONALLY CERTIFIED COLLECTIVE ACTION CLASS UNDER THE FLSA (ECF NO. 100) IS GRANTED. DEFT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH RESPECT TO PLFF MARKISHA GORDON'S CLAIMS UNDER THE FLSA (ECF NO. 104) IS GRANTED & JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFT MAXIM & AGAINST PLFF MARKISHA GORDON ON PLFF'S CLAIMS UNDER THE FLSA. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 7/21/17. 7/21/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARKISHA GORDON
v.
MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES,
INC.

:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 13-7175

ORDER
AND NOW, this

21st

day of

July

, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s

Motion for Certification (ECF No. 73); Defendant’s Motion to De-certify Conditionally Certified
Collective Action Class (ECF No. 100); and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 104), and all documents and exhibits submitted in support thereof, and in opposition thereto,
it is ORDERED as follows:
1.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Certification of her claims under the WPCL (ECF No. 73)
is DENIED.

2.

Defendant’s Motion to De-certify the Conditionally Certified Collective Action
Class under the FLSA (ECF No. 100) is GRANTED.

3.

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to Plaintiff Markisha
Gordon’s claims under the FLSA (ECF No. 104) is GRANTED, and judgment is
entered in favor of Defendant Maxim and against Plaintiff Markisha Gordon on
Plaintiff’s claims under the FLSA.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:

__________________________
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.