RILEY v. ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE IS DENIED AS MOOT, AND THE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 10/6/2015. 10/6/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ahf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER,
This 6th day of October, 2015, for the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum
Opinion, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Strike and for Sanctions, the Motion to
Strike is DENIED AS MOOT, and the Motion for Sanctions is DENIED. 1
/s/ Gerald Austin McHugh
United States District Court Judge
Although I have not issued sanctions, the conduct of Plaintiff’s counsel certainly reaches the outer boundary of
permissible advocacy, and the Court takes a particularly dim view of the contradictory post-deposition Certifications
filed. Counsel and his firm would be well advised to avoid such behavior in the future.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?