WINDOWIZARDS, INC. et al v. CHARTER OAK FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PARTIES' MARCH 2 AND 3, 2015 LETTER BRIEFS REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR DOCUMENTS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE ON 3/26/15. 3/26/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WINDOWIZARDS, INC., HARVEY
GOODMAN, Partner, and
MOORE STREET ASSOCIATES
CHARTER OAK FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY, Member of Travelers Group
of Insurance Companies
AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2015, upon consideration of the parties’ March 2
and 3, 2015 letter briefs regarding a discovery dispute over documents allegedly protected under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) (Doc. Nos. 37 & 38), and after teleconferences on
March 3 and 20, 2015, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ request for documents is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
The defendant must furnish to the plaintiffs documents 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 8 listed
on the privilege log attached to the accompanying memorandum.
Documents 4, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, and 14 are privileged under Rule 26(b)(4)(C) and
need not be turned over to the plaintiffs.
The first and third paragraphs of document 12 are privileged under Rule
26(b)(4)(C), however, paragraph two, listing enclosed documents, is not.
defendant shall provide to the plaintiffs an appropriately redacted version of this letter.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ David R. Strawbridge
DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?