HACKNEY v. T.D. BANK
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT T.D. BANK'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT (#6) IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFF LARRY HACKNEY PROCEEDING IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN THE EVENT THE PARTIES CANN OT RESOLVE THIS MATTER THEMSELVES. HACKENY'S "MOTION FOR DELAID SETTLEMENT" (#7) IS DENIED. HACKNEY'S "MOTIONS TO THE COURT TO ORDER DEFENDANTS TO SHOW THE DATE, AMOUNT, AND THE CHECK IN XEROX FORM #1 SHEET OF 8 1/2 x 11,&quo t; (#9) IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO DOCKET HACKNEY'S "MOTION DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CUT CHECK," WHICH WAS RECEIVED WITH HIS "MOTION FOR DELAID SETTLEMENT," AS HAVING BEEN FILED ON MARCH 27, 2014. THE "MOTION DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CUT CHECK" IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 5/12/14. 5/13/14 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPY MAILED TO HACKNEY.(fdc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AND NOW, this 12th day of May, 2014, upon consideration of the following motions
and responses thereto, and for the reasons stated in the Court’s Memorandum, it is ORDERED:
Defendant T.D. Bank’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Document 6) is
The Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff Larry Hackney
proceeding in the Southern District of Florida in the event the parties cannot resolve this matter
Hackney’s “Motion for Delaid Settlement” (Document 7) is DENIED.
Hackney’s “Motions the Court to Order Defendants to Show the Date, Amount,
and the Check in Xerox form on #1 Sheet of 8 ½ x 11,” (Document 9) is DENIED.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to docket Hackney’s “Motion Defendants to
Show Cut Check,” which was received with his “Motion for Delaid Settlement,” as having been
filed on March 27, 2014. The “Motion Defendants to Show Cut Check” is DENIED.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez .
Juan R. Sánchez, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?